Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology
Original Article

Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the knowledge about childhood autism among health workers questionnaire

1.

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Clinic, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Training and Research Hospital, Muğla, Turkey

2.

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey

3.

Department of Public Health, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey

Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology 2019; 29: 765-773
DOI: 10.1080/24750573.2019.1637326
Read: 1132 Downloads: 572 Published: 08 February 2021

Objective: The aim of this study is to present the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the knowledge about childhood autism among health workers (KCAHW) questionnaire.

Methods: Three hundred fifteen primary health care facility workers and 28 child and adolescent mental health professionals were enrolled in this study. Participants filled out socio-demographic data forms and the KCAHW. Reliability analyses consisted of internal consistency and test–retest reliability. For validity analysis, construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis -CFA) and criterion validity were used.

Results: The mean KCAHW questionnaire score was 13.83 ± 2.55. The floor effects in all domains were below 15%, the ceiling effects were over 15% in overall score and in Domain 4. Intraclass correlation coefficient and the Kuder Richardson 21 values were 0.83 and 0.683, respectively; All goodness of fit indices generated by CFA were found satisfactory (Comparative fit index = 0.79; Root mean square error of approximation = 0.056, and chi-square/degree of freedom = 1.91). Being a physician, being a CAMH specialist, having mental health clinic experience, having done a child psychiatry internship, knowing someone diagnosed with autism, follow-up experience of a patient with autism, having previous autism training, and the perception of adequate knowledge about autism, significantly increased the KCAHW scores (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The Turkish version of the KCAHW questionnaire is reliable (in terms of test-retest and internal consistency) and valid (sensitive some known/expected external criteria). Due to the insufficient internal consistency in Domain 4, the scores received from Domain 4 should be evaluated with caution.

Files
EISSN 2475-0581